The legendary Arthur Lydiard’s training program is often misunderstood, even by people who believe that they fully understand his methodology.

Lydiard training may not be what you think it is.

Some of the most well-known coaches claim that they coach based on the Lydiard principles and practices. They may, however, on the surface, there seems to exist conflicting evidence.

At a 2013 Canadian Endurance Conference in Vancouver, Coach James Li of the University of Arizona, who is known for coaching the likes of Lawli Lalang (13:00.95 – 5,000-metres – 3:33.20 – 1500m) and four-time Olympian Bernard Lagat, stepped up to the microphone and started his presentation with, “I coach according to the Arthur Lydiard method.” After his presentation, he was followed by the legendary Alberto Salazar, coach of Olympic silver medallist Galen Rupp. He has also coached Kara Goucher, Cameron Levins, Mo Farah, and many other international athletes. Salazar also began his speech with the comment that he too coaches by the Arthur Lydiard method.

Salazar is known to stew over the fine details of his athlete’s training program. In contrast, when Li spoke at the conference, he said, “I am not sure how many miles Lalang runs some weeks, sometimes his friends will go for a run and he will take off with them on not tell me. I guess he runs about 60 miles per week.”

Li may have had some ulterior motive. Either he was hiding training details on competing coaches who were in the room or he was referencing a period of training that included more quality work – closer to race time. During the 1980s, when Sebastian Coe made a comment that he ran just 60-miles-per-week it set off a generation of interval-trained speed junkies and subsequently caused a dearth in quality performances in North America and parts of Europe.

Salazar’s athletes run roughly double what Li was suggesting Lalang trained up to.

So you may ask, how can two highly successful coaches be so different, yet both claim to coach the Lydiard way?

Lydiard training is not a set program or a specific weekly schedule that applies to all runners equally. Although his books contain schedules, they were added at the insistence of the publisher. Lydiard did not want to publish schedules as each runner and their situation is unique to them; schedules sells books.

Lydiard training is governed by a set of five principles that apply to all runners of all abilities and in fact all endurance athletes including cyclists, swimmers, nordic skiers, speed skaters, and rowers, for example. (He wrote the book, Swim the Lydiard Way and has advised an Olympic figure skater, speed skaters, and elite rowers).

Many believe that Lydiard training is exclusively about running 100 miles (162K) per week and running long slow distances, but this is incorrect. Yes, his Olympians ran approximately 162K per week, but he would coach anyone. For example, he was the first person to get cardiac patients outside walking and running to strengthen the heart, when at the time, it was standard practice to “recover” while resting in bed. It is now common protocol to recover from a heart attack via exercise; thank you Arthur Lydiard.

On occasion, he sounded as though he was contradicting himself. For example, when he would publicly speak and use the term “long slow distance” he was referring to one of two types of long runs and their relative pace compared to other running efforts.

One is a run that provides a very specific recovery purpose. For example, a burnt out international athlete may have toured Australia, New Zealand, followed by Europe and then North America, racing over a very long schedule. The athlete would perhaps need aerobic refreshing long runs, which can be done extremely slow, sometimes back-to-back. One time, one of his athletes said that he felt stale after his long tour. Lydiard told him to go run for three hours, two days in a row and as slow as possible. He did and returned to form soon after.

Perhaps science can give us the physiological reasons why those dead-slow long runs refreshed fried athletes, but we know it worked.

Also, long run pace or effort is about perspective. In comparison to how fast his elite runners raced an 800-metre or 1500-metre or 5,000-metre distance event, a three-hour long run over big hills is comparatively slow – long running wasn’t done before Lydiard as part of a training program for middle-distance athletes. Those runs were not necessarily slow as long runs go. Lydiard himself said, “We were not fooling around out there,” as they ran over the 22-mile (35/36K) Waiatarua hills.

There is also a story of Olympic gold medallist and world record holder in the 800-metres, Peter Snell sitting on the side of the road totally dejected with his 2:40, 22-mile long run. He was not running long and slow, but long and steady without straining.

The five guiding principles

General Conditioning First: At the beginning of any Lydiard training cycle, there is a long phase of aerobic running to build endurance and lay the foundation for fast training and a good performance on race day. The “aerobic” or “base” phase as it is commonly known could last from as short as eight weeks to half a year. Commonly eight to 12 weeks was undertaken, depending on the runner. During this phase, no anaerobic training is done, so no racing or hard speed work.

For most runners, this means you may enjoy the benefit of easy, medium and strong paces at mostly relaxed efforts. A once every-other-week “out-and-back” run could be added, where you run the same route out and back at an even, but strong effort. As the weeks go by, your runtime becomes shorter, voila! You are becoming aerobically fitter. Keys are to run at the same even pace the entire time and to run very strong, without straining. One should finish the run saying, “I could have run faster if I had to, however, I am glad I didn’t.
For those who believe one must stay in touch with their speed, there is a weekly fartlek session that is run by feel. Additionally, easy strides are incorporated on a recovery or easy run – neither of which should be anaerobic.

Response Regulated Training: The Lydiard way allows for you to adjust your effort levels based on how you are responding to training stimulus to optimize your fitness improvement.

Today we have the luxury of heart rate monitors to tell us if our heart rate is running high. When our heart rate is running high we likely haven’t recovered from training or are under the weather. This is a time to train lightly until fully recovered. The next principle is about training by feel, to rely on your instincts. But it is important, whether you develop the powerful instincts to be able to tell if you are recovered or if you rely on an HRM, to be willing to adjust your training efforts and distances according to these signals.

Lydiard coined the phrase “train, don’t strain.”  There is a time for running really fast, but first things first. A properly developed aerobic foundation allows you to run more speed volume than you may otherwise be able to withstand when it is time to do so.

Feeling Based Training: Learning to accurately interpret the language of your physiology allows the runner to stretch the training envelope while avoiding the perils of overtraining.

Lorraine Moller, co-founder of the Lydiard Foundation and four-time Olympian (bronze in Barcelona 1992 in the marathon) wrote a wonderful article about being a “body whisperer”. These two principles Feeling Based Training and Response Regulated Training can be done best when you unplug completely from devices for some or all of your runs. Rather than be distracted by your HRM or pace via your watch or music. Listen to your own breathing and the feedback your body is naturally providing while on a run. Tuning out via music distracts from your very natural ability to read body signals. In Lydiard training you are not “surviving the distance,” you are striving to be better at it.

Sequential Development: Rather than train for everything at the same time, train in order. You will hear runners talk about their hill training and speed work and tempo runs and time trials or races and long runs, all done during the same week. This is not optimal.

There is a process for runners of all abilities that starts with the base phase first and ends with sharpening so that the runner is completely ready to perform on race day. This training is based on the methodology of developing the building blocks like a pyramid so that you are ready on race day to perform your best. The peak of the pyramid can sit higher if the base at the bottom is bigger (and done first).

Ever notice a fellow runner have a poor race and immediately after finishing he or she begins to talk about what the problem could be, guessing the whole time? When a runner haphazardly throws all the ingredients into the weekly training program, they get mixed and random results that they have no real explanation for. The answer is usually to throw more so-called “speed work” at the problem, compounding the issue.

Peaking: The later phases of Lydiard training are designed to sharpen the runner to a point where they are in peak condition – like the top of the pyramid. So that on race day the athlete (of all abilities) is in an excellent position to run the best race possible.

I have seen race winners, age-groupers; mid-packers and back-of-the-pack runners all start their watch as the gun sounds and then click stop at the finish line when the race is over. Everyone looks at their watch to see how they have done. Almost every single participant has a time or placement goal even if they keep it silent, no matter how modest or elite that goal may be.

Running the Lydiard way isn’t just for serious athletes; Lydiard would never refuse to coach based on ability.

There are many misconceptions about the Arthur Lydiard method of endurance training. Following the sequence of training and adhering to the above five principles will provide a sound foundation to train whether under the guidance of a coach or on your own.

“If your coach cannot explain why you are doing any particular run, get a new coach.”
– Arthur Lydiard.